Democrat Presidential Candidates’ Energy Policies Will Hurt Markets

Date:  Comments: 0 - Permalink

In the wake of Super Tuesday, presidential candidates’ policy proposals are starting to feel a lot more real. All of the Democratic presidential candidates have antagonized the natural gas and oil industry since the first day of their respective campaigns, but, now that the number of nominees has narrowed, their proposals are being seriously considered. For the energy industry and the economy, any of the Democratic candidates would mean bad news.

Foreign
Policy 
reports:

The
three leading Democratic candidates—Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, former Vice
President Joe Biden, and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren—all propose
vigorous federal action to limit or even roll back production of oil and
natural gas.

In
particular, Democrats are targeting hydraulic fracking. In a little over a
decade, the fracking boom transformed the U.S. from the world’s biggest oil
importer into the world’s biggest oil and gas producer. This has given us an
edge on the international stage and in curbing greenhouse gas emissions. Still,
Biden is advocating for heavy restrictions on fracking, and Sanders and Warren
are pushing for an outright ban.

Tallying
up the different proposals on the table—from bans on fracking to offshore
drilling, and tougher scrutiny of oil and gas investments, McNally (the head of
Rapidan Energy Group) said the oil and gas industry is bracing for a potential
regulatory onslaught. “If a Democrat wins, we’re going to see a Tet Offensive
against the oil and gas industry the likes of which we’ve never seen before,”
he said.

Kevin
Book, the co-founder and managing director of ClearView Energy Partners,
believes that oil and stock markets will be changing for the worse if a
Democratic candidate ends up in office.

“None
of the Democrats, from an energy-production point of view, are moderate.”

America
needs a president that is practical and considers the impact a policy will have
on jobs, the economy, and the international playing field – not a president
that enacts policies on the basis of unproven, political talking points.

Jason
Bordoff, a former Obama energy and climate advisor and the founding director of
the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University, may have said it
best:

“The
shale revolution has been a game changer from a geopolitical standpoint,” Bordoff
said. “If U.S. oil and gas output suddenly collapsed and imports rose, that
would weaken the United States geopolitically, and benefit countries around the
world that don’t always have U.S. interests at heart.”

This content was originally published here.

About admin

Highlighted News:

Sorry, no posts matched the criteria.
Sorry, no posts matched the criteria.
Sorry, no posts matched the criteria.

No Comments

Be the first to start a conversation